<Zuo>

You.

- - -

(And I seek something, even if we are denying it or covering it up with something else, there is an outside question between the cover of the cloth, maybe steel woven door's, chained doors, or every restriction on that seeking, perhaps it has been hurt by senseless shit people may have done, disaster's or whatnot. That is, "Who and what is truth?, and why is he true?")

(Let us go over multiple worldviews firsthand so that we can have a coherent understanding firstly.)

- - - (What I've known of the Atheistic World view, there's subjectivity and an attempt of objectivity a lack of justification for the Transcendental Categories, which in itself isn't even truth nor is it binding, it borrows the tools that the Christian World view has and uses it without firstly justifying why this functions and how it functions, and the basic thing I'd like to call out, is the Is and Ought problem, Societial Well Being, Evolutionary Adaptation, is an IS, not an ought, and that is mainly still subjective and does have the Value Judgement without much of a coherent justification, and still have an implication of a higher moral compass even though there isn't much to go around as of why we OUGHT to lessen suffering, as alikes to cause, but as an example, someone steals something valuable from someone that doesn't damage anything or whatnot <Whether it'd be food, a non needed object like an unread book, etc> would it still be "Evil"?, and as I've said earlier, What IS, but not an ought and it goes in the Genetic Fallacy. In Materialism, Empiricism in metaphysics, it can't account for Self <Consciousness>, Identity Overtime, Teleology and other's. As it already pressumes that they have a in set Justification for their world view, which they can't even give, neither Ought, or a Coherent Foundation that holds up. That's the side of the Pragmatic Side) (As it borrows the Christian Tools, but doesn't have the means of Justifiying it and why it works) (Shorter Simplified Version)

(-Non Monotheistic Positions/World views)

- Hinduism, Buddhism, Etc

-(Hinduism famously deal's with multiple deities or god's as called, but also having no definitive metaphysical justifications for the Transcendental Categories as well, as of an objective grounding, which is somewhat similar to Atheistic position of Moral Realism <At some thought, it deals with multiple gods which already makes it unreliable to have an objective standard or firm grounding of the Transcendental Categories <Like Logic, Ethic's, Teleology, Meaning, Truth, etc)

(Buddhism also deals with the same critique, though another that is added being illusion, which itself is a self defeating position since that also pressumes that Buddhism is a made illusionary world view)

(And other's which lack Epistemic Justifications)

(Monotheistic Positions/World Views)

- Islam, Judaism, Christianity

-Lets go over a simple critique of a singular God, "Is Allah/God dependant on creation to be called 'Eternally' Loving or even Loving?, since there isn't another person as well to Love, so is he therefore reliant to creation?"

-<Unfortunately I don't know much of responses since i haven't encountered it>-

(Islamic Position - Tawhid <Uhhh, basically, my critique is going over, Are all the part's of Allah similar to him?, then how do we know these part's of Allah?, since everything Allah is, is beyond us, how can we know his Love?>

(Islamic Position - "If Islam is true, Didn't Allah deceive billions of people to Jesus being crucified?, and thus responsible for billions of false worship, and Jesus also have to have told a different saying than what the Quran has in the Book)

(Islamic Position - Why does the Prophet Muhammad, been allowed to Consummate a Marriage to a 9 Year old? <Sahih Al-Bukhari 5134, and Why did he allow Women Captive in war's to be taken, especially when they are still married to their alive husband's? <Surah 23:1-6 and Surah 4:24 and Sahih Muslim 8:3432 and Sunan Abu Dawud 2150> and this goes on as an pratice..)

(And it is affirmed in Surah Al-Ahzab 33:21 that Muhammad was the Greatest example of all Muslims..)

(Jewish Position - Line to the Messiah)

(Isaiah 53, Micah 5:2 and Other scriptural texts affirms a suffering Messiah, for the Transgressions of Man and the Path to Salvation, Though there's a generic Critique back on Isaiah 53,being that, it talk's about Israel metaphorically, but it states as well in Isaiah 53:8 and as well as 53:9, which states "He was cut off from the land of the living stricken for the Transgressions of MY PEOPLE" which is Israel, and other's as well, is Israel Sacrificing itself to Israel?, and surely, Israel is Blameless..)

(There are still so many prophecies Jesus has accomplished, but the most important of all is his victory on the Cross against Death itself, and making a bridge to God and Man as it was supposed to be on the Garden of Eden)

<I'm aware that there are still other issues, but these are some for now, since it is WAYY too long>

(Now we go forth for the Christian Position, The Last)

(We can go over and probably skip the Heretical Positions, Inglesya ni Cristo, Mormonism, Jehovah's witnesses, which have no apostolic succession and merely circular in reasoning as of why they are true, especially Mormonism claiming to have had to received Golden Plates of scripture, but suddenly Lost it?, Joseph Smith sure is convenient)

(Now, First hand, The Protestant Position)

(Sola Fide - Sola fide is basically a doctrine that say's, Once Saved Always saves. But the Bible clearly states as well Hebrews 10:26 <"If we deliberately go on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for our sins is left"> And Roman's 6:23 <For the Wages of Sin is Death, But the Gift of God is Eternal Life in Christ Jesus our Lord> and it doesn't say as well in Scripture that were always saved once we're saved, we can stray away from God, but we also have the choice to come back, which is repentance, humbling one'sself and being cleansed again)

(Sola Scirptura, it also is unbiblical since it doesn't say it follow scripture only, Jew's didn't do that, and nonetheless, the forming of the books, is done by the early Christian's, you cant say you can you rely on them to not pick out forgeries or corrupted one's since they're fallible, right?. And CALVINISM IS A DANGEROUS LINE, since it deals with predestination <Which, due to God knowing everything meaning he's already predestined us all, which isn't true and is a misunderstanding on God's nature and truth, especially free will, we can function as secondary causes, and God knowing everything doesn't mean he is the SOLE cause of that> and dealing with Jesus < The Son > being condemned by the Father to Hell, which.. breaks the trinity, since how can someone be condemned and seperated from the Trinity?. <There are other issues, but it'll be WAYYY too long> and Roman Catholicism. The papal infallibility comes into question first, and how it formed and whether it is biblical. But we may know it was formed on the vatican 1. <Also the Title Pope is just a Bishop, not a role> but is that council itself infallible?, since it does come to a question. And does the bible affirm a inflatable man amongst the bishop?, a higher bishop?, none. And It's said best "Whoever claims himself be a Higher Bishop, be an Antichrist" <And other issues, I've unfortunately forgotten many due to my absence in studying and lack of focus on it, but i remember some of the points, so again, recommending Jay Dyer on these>)

(Now then, we have already gone over the other World views, let's see, Orthodoxy <Specifically Eastern Orthodoxy, not Oriental, which they deal mainly with Christ having one nature asides from two for The Eastern Orthodox Position, which i won't address for now>. We have assessed that, Non Theistic, have no Justifications, And Jewish and Islamic position's having it's own issues <Especially When talking about the Messiah, Jesus>)

(This leads us to Christ, who is both Human and Divine, in unison, bearing the Sin's or Man and Forming a path to man towards God, as it was supposed to be in the Garden of Eden, Jesus's sacrifice on the Cross isn't just Forgiveness, it's redemptive, and the best word to say describe it is, Theosis, being like Christ. And the EO postion is the only one with a coherent interal world view.)

(But the question, why should we care is there, right?, well, we are gonna be responsible for our knowledge, especially when it is truth. And nonetheless, everyone doesn't deserves the peace of the Light given by God, for we have all sinned against him, and have put ourselves down the ladder and to the everfalling abyss of seeking out temporary distraction's, instant gratification, and momentary happiness. Joy is different from Happiness, Purpoe is Different from Distraction, and Patient Gratification is different from Instant.)

(-We should also remember, Matthew 7:21-23 "Not everyone who say's to me Lord Lord, shall inherit the Kingdom of heaven, but those who do the will of the Father who is in heaven, When the day comes, many will say to me on the last day, Lord Lord, have we not prophecied and healed sick, and cast out demons in your name, and I will declare to them, I never knew you, depart from me, you worker's of iniquity" <Which means working for the means of "Salvation" we cannot work out salvation, and that is a common and unfortunate view, that if we rely on doing good, not needing any repentence, true change, and connection to God, we can go to heaven, which is, absolutely dangerous, since we cannot work of for our salvation, as it is a given gift by God through Grace, and we accept it, not that we earn it. Ephesians 2:8-10>)

(Go forth with Truth and Love, not Self Loathing, for there is redemption and peace in truth, rather than staying in our despair of hopelessness. Seek out truth, you aren't forced to do anything else, but it is by choice, but i advice you to seek out Truth.)

("No peace from this world compares to His.")

(You may ask me questions about this, but YOU also can search more than I am now, especially on other writing's and critique's, and maybe watch a little bit of Jay Dyer, and his Podcasts, since this is not enough to really dwell into every issue, and the one's I've learned through a year and some months.. This is basically some part's of what I learned through out a year and a month, but the Presuppositional approach?, only some weeks surprisingly, but other's <Specifically Islam, Atheism, Judaism, Christianity> took months if a year to get a hold of alot. And I'd admit, it is too short to even get everything out of the way, this is an encouragement of finding out more thing's as well, not merely an full out "answer" That'll take too long, and honestly I'm WAYYY too lazy for that *Wink wink*)

Translate

6 months ago   29 views   1 frames   5 Like

👍 Like

    Download

See all 20 comments