peach

peach

Although it was not anything sexually inappropriate, it was still child on child abuse toward the victims, I had spoke to one of the victim wayyyy long time ago, they told me that they had trauma between this direct person. (I agree that he was not a pedo, but it was exactly child on child abuse because directly harming the victim, as he did not do anything sexually nor inappropriately. Jevil had dated them when he was the age of 15/14, BUT. this still was child on child abuse against what he has done to the victims their self.)


Replies

  peach

peach

Also I just want to let all of your information is correct! :D
(It was along great a thing to plan together! Although. I still state it was still child on child abuse basically, Sorry if this also came in an offensive way though! Did not mean that in any rude way quite of course hahah 😁)

1 weeks ago   回复

登录后可发表评论 登录