I can’t imagine hitler being a good leader whatsoever. His party was entirely based around his hatred of Jewish people. Had he put aside his hatred of Jews, he wouldn’t have had a party or even been a leader at all.
And then when he was in power, he didn’t unify Germany at all. People listened to him out of fear of being killed, not because they liked him. Sure, there were some that liked him and what he stood for, but a vast majority of people didn’t agree with him and only followed his orders to stay alive.
There was no potential whatsoever, he would’ve been a terrible leader had he taken Germany into war or not. Again, If he put aside his hatred of Jews, he wouldn’t have been a leader at all.
Replies
Not necessarily.
His party was built upon the idea that Germany had to be lifted from its great depression at the time.
When he gave them promises, he followed through with them.
But his power got to him.
That's why dictatorship is NEVER a good idea.
People listen to him because they DID believe in him, because he did alot for them.
Nobody in Germany knew about the camps until after the war, people did like him.
BUT, he was prideful.
In the end, he died the same moody, childish, angry man he always was.
If he weren't racist, he would've made it far.
But, I am proud of Germany for freeing itself from his hate, and becoming peaceful
For the first time in forever, Germany is not constantly in war
Hitlers main mistake was going to war immidiently, that played a big part in his genocide
I would sitlk argue that stalin was worse than Hitler, though.
Keep in mind, I don't support Hitler.
I am mexican, he would have me killed in a matter of minutes