TAG <Longer Ver>

Might forget something

<The Transcendental Argument for God is as goes, laws of logic and universal principals, and ethics and other Transcendental Categories will have no Justification in the Atheistic world view, and why these truth's exist.

Especially for ethics which i am now more familiar with, there is no ought in the Atheistic world view, why we ought, and why this thing is ultimately wrong or right, atheist's try to uphold a moral realism position, but this has no justification for why these moral truth's exist, or why we ought to, and moral relativists will have to be consistent with themselves logically, as of why they are trying to get "injustice" out and why we call out the bad being done.

And for Logic as well, there's no justification or account for why these truth's exist, and if one says it just is, then why can't i say God just is by that circular reasoning?, and that's not an argument, as we see there's an objective logica fact

The Empiricist/Materialistic position cannot account for these Transcendental Categories as well, and one funny thing, if empiricism is the best way to truth then can you empirically prove that's true?

<I believe there's many other examples>

Translate

See all 0 comments